THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 10 December 2019 (Moment of reckoning (Indian Express))

Moment of reckoning (Indian Express)

Mains Paper 2 : International
Prelims level : Rohingya Crisis
Mains level : Myanmar move to address rohingya issues


  • Aung San Suu Kyi’s decision to appear before the International Court of Justice to defend Myanmar from charges of genocide against Rohingya Muslims is a gambit.
  • It is based on her international stature built over two decades of being a prisoner of conscience, detained by the Myanmar junta, and the knowledge that defending her country can only bolster her nationalistic credentials at home and even strengthen her standing vis a vis the all-powerful military.

Role of Suu Kyi

  • Suu Kyi, who holds the formal designation of State Counsellor to the government, but is de facto civilian leader of Myanmar, possibly believes that her defending her country’s actions against the Rohingya would carry credibility in the court.
  • Her decision to travel to The Hague has triggered an outpouring of support for her among Myanmar’s majority Buddhist communities.
  • Myanmar’s anti-Rohingya actions, for which it is being pulled up before the international court, enjoy much domestic support as the Rohingya are not considered “indigenous” to Myanmar, and do not have citizenship.
  • It is ironic that Suu Kyi, who had only some years ago, rallied international opinion against the army, will now appear in its support.
  • She may have sensed that it might provide her a more equal footing with the country’s most powerful institution, which is also the biggest obstacle to constitutional reform.

Backed by Gambia:

  • The most powerful countries seemed powerless in the face of Myanmar’s actions against the Rohingya community, it was a small country like Gambia, backed by the Organisation for Islamic Co-operation, that has taken it to the ICJ on charges of violating the UN convention of prevention of genocide.
  • Gambia’s lawsuit is based on a 2018 UN report that accused Myanmar of “genocidal intent”, and its Army of murder, rape and a host of other charges.
  • Suu Kyi’s staunch refusal to take the side of the Rohingya has disappointed all those who saw her as an icon of freedom and democracy. Her defence in court is likely to be what it has been elsewhere:
  • That military operations against the Rohingya in the Rakhine were actions against terrorism.

Way ahead:

  • The outflow of Rohingya refugees from Myanmar has impacted several of its neighbours, particularly Bangladesh, which now hosts the largest Rohingya refugee camp in the world, as well as Thailand and other countries in south east Asia, where thousands from the communuity have fled to escape persecution.
  • In India, too, the presence of the Rohingya has added to the polarising debate on the religion of refugees.
  • This case at the ICJ is sure to have ramifications beyond the borders of Myanmar.

    Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

    General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1) With reference to the Instrument in Support of Trade Exchanges (INSTEX), consider the following statements:
1. It is a European special-purpose vehicle (SPV) to circumvent U.S. sanctions against trade with North Korea by avoiding use of the dollar.
2. France, Germany and United Kingdom are the founding members of INSTEX.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: B
Mains Questions:

Q.1) To what extent Suu Kyi’s refusal to speak for Rohingya is significant to defend army at ICJ sets off ripples beyond Myanmar. Comment.