About time India got a seat at the high table (Mint)

Mains Paper 2 : International Relations
Prelims level : UNSC
Mains level : India’s permanent representation requires at UNSC

Context

• Prime Minister called upon all like-minded nations to push for an overhaul of the United Nations (UN) structure.

Requires reform

• The UN is being used by some members as a tool rather than an institution to resolve global conflicts.
• It is formed in 1945 after World War II with that war’s victors, the US, Russia, UK, France and China, as permanent members of its Security Council, and for decades afterwards, the Big Five did exercise disproportionate clout in world affairs by virtue of their nuclear arsenals. Today, this is no longer so.
• If contemporary geopolitical realities are to be taken into account, then the Council needs to induct other countries as veto holders as well.
• The UN’s apex decision-making unit has remained stuck in time.
• Structural deficiencies have rendered the UN largely ineffective on matters of war and peace.
• If reforms are not undertaken soon enough, it risks turning into a relic of the 20th century.

Signs of losing authority

• The UN’s lost authority was the US’s 2003 offensive against Iraq, as part of its War on Terror in response to the 9/11 attacks.
• This campaign did not have any UN sanction, nor was it sought, unlike America’s previous strikes against Baghdad, the 1990-91 effort to evict Iraqi forces from Kuwait.
• Unilateral military actions by major world powers seem to have gained a measure of legitimacy, and the very idea of the Council working out solutions to international problems has turned anachronistic.
• This may suit some countries that are used to having their way, such as the US, but open disregard for multilateral deliberations has reduced the UN to a talk shop. This is disconcerting.
• American century gives way to an Asian one, it’s all the more crucial that the UN regains the stature needed to act as a force for peace.

Require inclusion of India at UNSC

• India has a strong case for permanent membership of the Council, although China has been thwarting its entry.
• India is a rapidly emerging economy, provides large numbers of soldiers to the UN for peace-keeping missions, and is armed with nuclear weapons, for which it has a clear no-first-use policy stated upfront.
• The country accounts for almost one-fifth of all humanity.

Way forward

• UN reforms would mean seats at the high table for other worthy candidates, too.
• Realpolitik may determine the eventual outcome of a structural rehaul, and India could arguably do with a better record on conflict resolution, but a country of our strength and diversity simply cannot be left out of the power matrix for much longer.
• As the UN turns 75 next year, it’s high time it makes space for India at the high table.

  Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

  General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1) With reference to the Mobile Metallic Ramp (MMR), consider the following statements:
1. It has been designed and developed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research’s premier research laboratory, Central Road Research Institute (CRRI).
2. It will provide the strategic mobility for Armoured and Mechanized units and formations of the Army.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: B
Mains Questions:
Q.1) Do you think India should be a permanent member of UNSC? What are the reforms requires to improve the functions of UNSC?