Appropriate strategy: On India banning more China apps(The Hindu)

Mains Paper 2: International Relations 
Prelims level: China apps
Mains level: 

Context: 

• The blocking of a hundred more Chinese mobile applications suggests that the Indian government, not for the first time in recent months, wants to make it amply clear that it will not shy away from leveraging its position as a massive market for technology in dealing with potentially dangerous geopolitical issues. 

About:

• Since June, when border tensions between India and China turned ugly, the government has till now stepped in thrice to block many Chinese applications in one go. 
• In the latest such decision, it blocked 118 apps, including the widely popular gaming app, PUBG, as well as WeChat Work and Baidu, owing to these being “prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of State and public order”. 
• Over 200 Chinese apps, which were accessed by millions of Indian users, have been blocked in all till date. 

Merit of banning Chinese Apps:

• The decision has been taken based on several complaints, a press release said, of these apps “stealing and surreptitiously transmitting users’ data in an unauthorized manner to servers which have locations outside India”. 
• It could be argued that loss of access to the Indian market will sharply affect the ambitions of the Internet giants emerging from China, but it remains to be seen if this tech-side intervention is effective as a counter in a geopolitical fight. 
• Also, how far can India go to keep the Chinese players, who are well entrenched in the global tech supply chain, off the Indian market without prejudicing its own growth?
• It is difficult to argue against decisions that are taken on the plank of national security, especially one arrived at by invoking the government’s power under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, a section upheld by the courts previously. 
• But it would be well argued that the Indian approach should have followed due process, where the focus was on ensuring compliance with the law. 

Issues associated with the banning of apps:

• Instead, the Indian response to complaints has been to straight away block these apps end masse. 
• Meanwhile, millions of Indians who were engaging with these platforms, some gainfully, have to scramble for alternatives. To add to this, the data protection law, a dire need in this age, is not yet there. 
• All this does not bode well for a country with aspirations of global leadership of tech, an industry which thrives on global networks and rules. 

Way forward:

• Ironically, China, which for years has unleashed widespread censorship of information and kept apps from outside off its Internet, has found a rare chance to take the moral high ground. 
• It has criticised India’s move, accusing it of “abusing the concept of national security”. 
• The last thing India needs is to be compared with China as far as its Internet regulation goes. It certainly needs a more considered approach to tech regulation.

  Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

  E-Books Download for UPSC IAS Exams

  General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Material

Prelims Questions:

Q.1) Consider the following statements with reference to the India and Japan relations:

1. Japan has committed an official Development Assistance loan of 3,500 crore rupees for the COVID-19 Crisis Emergency Response Support to India.
2. Japan International Cooperation Agency, JICA is a governmental agency that coordinates Official Development Assistance for the Government of Japan.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: C

Mains Questions:

Q.1)What are the major reasons behind banning the Chinese Apps? What are the issues associated with the banning of apps? What are the possible solution?