The equivalence of farm loan waivers
and corporate NPAs
Mains Paper 4: Economy
Prelims level: NPA
Mains level: Indian Economy development
- A farm loan waiver is a sector-wide extinguishing of loans
mandated by the government, usually before an election, with the exchequer
- On the other hand, a corporate NPA represents a business failure,
for reasons internal and external, and triggers a bankruptcy process to
recover dues by financial creditors to the maximum extent possible either
through resolution or through liquidation.
- A bankruptcy process does not imply any liability of the
government, unless very large in magnitude.
- The government obligation can be more pressing if NPAs originate
in public sector banks or are due from public sector corporations.
Historical underpinnings of the bankruptcy procedure
- The equivalence arises when conditions warrant that the state must
indirectly bear the burden of corporate NPAs by infusing funds into banks,
as had happened in the US following the 2008 financial crisis and as is
happening now in India.
- Equivalence can also be drawn when the problem of corporate NPAs
repeats itself in the same sectors implying that, for some reason, banks
keep lending to the same sectors even in the absence of structural
- Persistent problems in power and infrastructure sectors and the
fate of development finance institutions before some of them converted to
universal banks immediately come to mind.
- The evidence of this equivalence would be a slowdown in both
agricultural and corporate lending occasioned by farm loan waivers and NPA
crises, respectively—something we have been witnessing in India for the last
- Another ground for equivalence arises if the resources of the
exchequer are used to buoy companies that would otherwise go into
- The assumption is that the motivation of keeping a company afloat
interferes with the objective of choosing the most efficient vendor, and
hence represents a distortionary cost.
- As in the case of preferential access to inputs such as coal, and
award of contracts without regard to expertise in areas such as defence.
Impact on economy
- A key underpinning of bankruptcy procedures is the limited
liability clause that protects the assets of promoters unless explicitly
- Corporate bankruptcy, therefore, is a simultaneous process of
cleansing bank balance sheets and a mechanism allowing optimal risk-taking
- Effective functioning of a bankruptcy law is expected to enable
the generation of new cycles of credit, with credit flowing to better
projects in similar or entirely new sectors.
- On the other hand, a farm loan waiver impedes the flow of such
credit as structural problems besetting agriculture are typically not
- Couched in these terms, corporate bankruptcies and farm loan
waivers appear to have nothing in common.
Bank recapitalizations vs. Farm loan waivers
- It seems that the criticism of farm loan waivers reflects a view
of the proper relation between the farm versus the non-farm sectors.
- It is believed that food prices for consumers must be kept low
through restrictions on farmers and subsidies to consumers.
- The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
estimates that the average yearly revenue lost by Indian farmers between
2014 and 2016 on account of export restrictions, net of subsidies received,
is ₹1.65 trillion.
- Historical performance shows that the credit quality of large
corporate borrowers is not superior to that of agriculture/priority sector
- In that context, interest rates charged by banks to large
corporate borrowers have been kept artificially low and incommensurate with
the risks involved.
- Low prices of agricultural products can also be achieved by
reducing the role of the middlemen but for various reasons, including the
political muscle involved, this does not happen.
- This model of development is no longer tenable.
- India can no longer rely only on exports and will have to look
towards domestic demand to power its growth. And skewing income distribution
away from 50% of the population will not help.
- Cities are unable to manage the influx of refugees from
- The Swaminathan report of 2006 clearly states that India’s food
security cannot be achieved through imports, thus emphasizing the imperative
of a healthy agricultural sector.
- From an ethical point of view, taking care of the big farmer who,
unlike the corporate promoter, risks losing personal assets in the event of
a default, is as important as taking care of the big businessman.
- The problem of the spendthrift farmer and that of the flagrant
corporate firm are two sides of the same coin.
- The difference is that unlike corporate honchos, farmers aren’t
fleeing the country.
Q.1) Consider the following statements regarding Public Affairs Index:
1. Public Affairs Centre (PAC) releases the Public Affairs Index.
2. According to Public Affairs Index 2017, Kerala and Tamil Nadu –has secured
first and second rankings respectively.
Correct code(s) is/are:
a) 1 only
b) 2 only
c) Both 1 and 2
d) Neither 1 nor 2
Q.1) If the recapitalization of banks is welcomed, why is a farm loan waiver not
HOT! UPSC GS STUDY Kit Offer (1000/- Off)
Call Us at +91 8800734161 (MON-SAT 11AM-7PM)