City on edge: On Hong Kong protests against extradition law (The Hindu)

Mains Paper 2: International
Prelims level: Extradition law
Mains level: Reasons behind the requirement of extradition law

Context

• The mass protests in Hong Kong this week against an extradition Bill the city legislative council is planning has brought the focus back on the difficult relationship between the territory’s Beijing-appointed authorities and its pro-democracy movement.
• The legislation, championed by Hong Kong’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam, will allow the local government to extradite a suspect to places with which the city has no formal extradition accord, including mainland China.

Reasons behind the requirement of extradition law

• Ms. Lam argues it is needed to close a loophole in the criminal justice system that, she says, has let criminals evade trial elsewhere by taking refuge in Hong Kong.
• But the protesters see the Bill as an attempt by Beijing to increase its influence in matters to do with the city.
• The extradition law would practically allow the city authorities to send any suspect wanted by Beijing to mainland China, where the judiciary is unlikely to go against the wishes of the establishment.
• Activists point to the abduction of Beijing’s critics and the growing authoritarian nature of the city government, with instances of elected lawmakers being disqualified, activists banned from running for office, a political party prohibited and a foreign journalist expelled.
• They fear that the new legislation would further erode the freedoms people enjoy under the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution.

Background

• When Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997, both sides had agreed that the city would remain a semi-autonomous region with the Basic Law for 50 years.
• When the extradition agreements were finalised, Taiwan and mainland China were excluded because of the different criminal justice systems that existed in those regions.
• But China has steadily tried to deepen its influence.
• In the case of the extradition Bill, two members of the Politburo Standing Committee have called for its approval.
• But Hong Kong has always resisted top-down changes. In 2003, the city’s first Chief Executive, Tung Chee-hwa’s bid to pass stringent security legislation triggered mass protests, which forced him
  to back down.
• In 2014, the local authorities’ proposal to change the city’s electoral system attracted more protests. In less than five years they are back: a million people assembled at the legislative council on Wednesday, demanding withdrawal of the extradition Bill.

Conclusion

• These incidents suggest a fundamental contradiction between the way Hong Kong is ruled by the pro-Beijing elite and the expectations of civil society.
• The local authorities’ insistence on going ahead with unpopular measures such as the extradition Bill is only sharpening this contradiction.
• Beijing should reach out to the people of Hong Kong, alleviate their fears and concerns and assure them of their rights guaranteed under the “one country two systems” model. Else, Hong Kong is likely to remain caught in a cycle of protests and repression.

  Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

  General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1) Which of the following statements is not correct with respect to Anti-matter?
(a) Antimatter was created along with matter after the Big Bang.
(b) Antimatter contains anti electrons with positive charge and anti protons with negative charge.
(c) When matter and antimatter come into contact, they annihilate and disappear in a flash of energy.
(d) The present universe contains equal mixture of both matter and antimatter.

Answer: D
Mains Questions:
Q.1) What do you mean by the extradition Bill? Describe its impact in relation between China and Hong Kong.