Writing out a clean Bill on health (The
Mains Paper 2: Health
Prelims level: NMC Bill
Mains level: Proposal of the NMC bill
- There have been expressions of concern in various fora over a few
clauses of the National Medical Commission (NMC) Bill, now enacted. Even
medical professionals have protested.
- According to media reports, there are five primary concerns.
- These pertain to the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET)/National
Exit Test, empowering of community health providers for limited practice,
regulating fees for only 50% seats in private colleges, reducing the number
of elected representatives in the Commission, and the overriding powers of
Focus on the examinations
- For the past few years, a separate NEET is being conducted for
undergraduate and postgraduate courses.
- In addition there are different examinations for institutes such as the
All India Institute of Medical Sciences and the Jawaharlal Institute of
Postgraduate Medical Education and Research.
- This Act consolidates multiple exams at the undergraduate level with a
single NEET and in turn avoids multiple counselling processes.
- NEXT will act as the final year MBBS examination across India, an
entrance test to the postgraduate level, and as a licentiate exam before
doctors can practise.
- It aims to reduce disparities in the skill sets of doctors graduating
from different institutions.
- It would also be a single licentiate exam for graduates across the
world. Thus, the government has in effect implemented a
‘One-Nation-One-Exam’ in medical education.
Limited license to practice for community health
- The concerns have been expressed over the limited licence to practise
for community health providers.
- We have to appreciate that even with about 70% of India’s population
residing in the rural areas, the present ratio of doctors in urban and rural
areas is 3.8:1; 27,000 doctors serve about 650,000 villages of the country.
- A recent study by the World Health Organisation shows that nearly 80% of
allopathic doctors in the rural areas are without a medical qualification.
- The NMC Act attempts to address this gap by effectively utilising modern
medicine professionals, other than doctors in enabling primary and
preventive health care. Evidence from China, Thailand and the United Kingdom
shows such integration results in better health outcomes.
- It is an open secret today that private medical colleges are capitation
fee-driven, resort to a discretionary management quota and often have
charges of corruption levelled against them.
- The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 has no provision for fee
- Until now, ‘not-for-profit’ organisations were permitted to set up
medical colleges, a process involving enormous investments and a negotiation
of cumbersome procedures.
- The NMC Act removes the discretionary quota by using a transparent fee
- It empowers the NMC to frame guidelines for determination of not only
fees but all other charges in 50% of seats in private colleges to support
poor and meritorious students.
Representation in the NMC
- The current electoral process of appointing regulators is inherently
saddled with compromises and attracts professionals who may not be best
suited for the task at hand.
- Indeed, there is ample evidence that the process has failed to bring the
best in the field in regulatory roles.
- The process is based on what is now widely regarded as a flawed
principle whereby the regulated elect the regulators.
- The Act, therefore, provides for a transparent search and selection
process with an eclectic mix of elected and nominated representatives, both
in the search committee and the commission itself.
- The government has further addressed the concern of preponderance of
selected members in the commission by adding members from State medical
councils and universities.
In a nutshell
- While some sections of people have sought to create a negative
perception about select clauses of the Act, they have not highlighted other
- The Act establishes the Diplomate of National Board’s equivalence to
NMC-recognised degrees — a long-pending demand. It also promotes medical
- Then, there is a paradigm shift in the regulatory philosophy from an
input-based, entry barrier for education providers without corresponding
benefits, to its becoming outcome-focused.
- Both the number of doctors and their skill sets are expected to improve.
- Autonomy to boards and segregation of their functions will avoid a
conflict of interest and reduce rent-seeking opportunities.
- And ‘quacks’ are liable to face imprisonment or be fined or both.
- The Act ends inspector raj.
- The efforts of successive governments have now culminated with the NMC
Act replacing the IMC Act.
- There is no denying that medical education needs continuous reforms in
order to usher in improvements in health care.
- There cannot be just one solution. The NMC Act is a serious attempt to
meet the primary need of more medical professionals in the country; it is a
- We need to view the issue of overriding powers of the Centre in the
context that the Medical Council of India, even if directed by the
government on critical matters, may not always pay heed. In public
emergencies, citizens expect the government to address issues.
- In the current set-up, it may not be possible all the time.
- Also, the government should be able to give directions so that NMC
regulations align with its policy.
- The use of such authority would follow the principle of natural justice:
the NMC’s opinion would be sought before giving directions.
Q.1) With respect to “Regional Rural Banks (RRBs)”, consider the following
1. They are jointly owned by the Central Government, concerned State
Government and the Sponsor Bank in the proportion of 50:15:35.
2. The RRB’s have also been brought under the ambit of priority sector lending
on par with the commercial banks.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. All the above
Q.1) Medical education needs continuous reforms; the National Medical Commission
Bill could be the first step towards this. Comment.