It’s time to raise the bar (The Hindu)
Mains Paper 2: Polity
Prelims level: Not much
Mains level: Structure, organization and functioning of the Executive and the
Judiciary Ministries and Departments of the Government
- Justice A.K. Sikri, a well-regarded judge of the Supreme Court of India,
found himself in the eye of a storm arising from accepting a post offered by
the government, last year, while being a judge of the court.
- By later turning down the offer after the controversy erupted, he
substantially redeemed the judiciary’s and his own honour.
- However, this is an issue that recurs frequently. Even titans in
the legal field have had to face stinging rebuke from respected members of
the fraternity for similar lapses.
The case of M.C. Chagla
- The case of the late Justice M.C. Chagla. Both he and the former
Attorney General of India, M.C. Setalvad, were members of the First Law
- Speaking as members of the Law Commission they had categorically
denounced the proclivity of judges accepting post-retirement jobs sponsored
by governments and called for an end to it.
- Unfortunately, in his post-retirement assignments, Justice Chagla
violated the very same principle he had supported.
- After retirement, he accepted a government appointment to serve as
Indian Ambassador to the U.S. (1958-61) and later as Indian High
Commissioner to the U.K (1962- 1963).
- Soon after this he was asked to be minister for education in
Nehru’s cabinet, which he again accepted.
- He served as Education Minister (1963-66) and then as Minister for
External Affairs (1966-67).
Law commission recommendation
- These harsh words are possibly unfair to a person of the calibre
- In none of the posts he held could he be accused of having acted
as a sidekick to the government.
- On the other hand, by declaring in 1965 that the Aligarh Muslim
University could not claim minority status conferred under Article 30(1) of
the Constitution, he even earned the collective ire of his cabinet members.
- However, the shrill denunciations of the Law Commission on judges
accepting post-retirement posts and Setalvad’s repeated calls to honour the
principle merit acceptance even today.
Striking a balance
- At the same time, it is also true that the valuable experience and
insights that competent and honest judges acquire during their period of
service cannot be wasted after retirement.
- Unlike abroad, a judge of the higher judiciary in India retires at
a comparatively young age and is capable of many more years of productive
- However, government-sponsored post-retirement appointments will
continue to raise a cloud of suspicion over the judgments the best judges
delivered while in service.
- Though cliched, it is true that in law justice must not only be
done but also be seen to be done.
- Therefore, the viable option is to expeditiously establish,
through a properly enacted statute, a commission made up of a majority, if
not exclusively, of retired judges to make appointments of competent retired
judges to tribunals and judicial bodies.
- It is true that judges cannot legislate.
- However, where a void is found in the legal framework that
requires immediate attention, and legislative intervention is not likely to
emerge immediately, the Supreme Court is empowered to provide an interim
solution till legislation is passed to address the hiatus.
- This process the top court has followed, to cite an instance
(there are others), in the Vishaka case, where it laid down guidelines to
deal with sexual harassment in workplaces till a law was passed by
- It is desirable the Supreme Court invokes that methodology now and
puts in place a process to regulate post-retirement appointments for judges.
- Such a process must sufficiently insulate the judiciary from the
charge of being a recipient of government largesse.
- In these times, the attacks on the fabric of independence of the
judiciary will not be through engulfing flames but through small corrosive
- Therefore, it is in the judiciary’s own interests to resolve this
issue as expeditiously as it can.
Q.1) Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment (GRIHA) ratings have
been developed by which of the following?
(a) TERI (The Energy Resource Institute)
(c) Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change
(d) None of the above
Q.1) The judiciary needs a mechanism to regulate post-retirement
government appointments. Give your arguments in this regard of this statement.