Welcome measure (Indian Express)
Mains Paper 3: Economy
Prelims level: ESI contribution
Mains level: Labour reforms
- In a welcome move, the Union government has announced a significant
reduction in the contribution by workers and employers towards the
employees’ state insurance (ESI) scheme.
- From July 1, the overall contribution to ESI is slated to decline from
6.5 per cent to 4 per cent, with employers’ contribution falling from 4.75
per cent to 3.25 per cent, and that of employees from 1.75 per cent to 0.75
- Lower Cost of hiring and formal jobs – This decision, which lowers the
cost of hiring for employers, should be seen in conjunction with recent
initiatives such as the Pradhan Mantri Rojgar Protsahan Yojna (PMRPY) that
aim to boost the creation of formal jobs by lowering the costs associated
- The ESI Act provides for medical care and cash benefits in case of
contingencies to employees drawing a salary up to Rs 21,000 per month. It is
one of the pillars of the social security architecture in the country.
Key Issues highlights
Contribution far exceeds the benefits
- A look at its accounts shows that the current levels of contribution far
exceed the benefits disbursed by it in fact, only around half of the
contributions are paid out as benefits.
- In 2016-17, while total contributions stood at Rs 16,852 crore
(including interest income of Rs 3,069 crore), total expenditure incurred
for medical benefits was only a fraction at Rs 6,409 crore.
- This growing divergence between collections and disbursement has led to
a substantial build up of its reserves.
- At the end of March 2018, its corpus stood at Rs 73,303 crore, up Rs
13,920 crore from last year. Between 2012 and 2017, it earned Rs 19,993
crore as interest income alone on this corpus.
- But this rise in income hasn’t translated to greater benefits.
Key highlights of the standing committee on labour’s report
- As the standing committee on labour noted in a report last year, people
continue to be deprived of the benefits of the ESI scheme “due to lack of
coverage of ESIC scheme, poor functioning of hospitals, etc”.
- This suggests that contributions can be substantially lowered, while
maintaining benefits at current levels.
- Prohibitive mandatory contributions such as the provident fund/employee
state insurance tend to act as deterrents to formalisation.
- As the experience of PMRPY has shown, lowering these costs tends to have
a positive impact on formalisation.
- In fact, much of the recent rise in the EPFO subscriber base is on
account of PMRPY.
Q.1) Which of the following best describes the equation between rights and
(a) Citizens can only have rights, while state can have both rights and
(b) To not violate any right of a citizen is solely the obligation of his/her
(c) Rights not only place obligations on the state, but also on every citizen.
(d) Only those rights of the citizens which have environmental aspects place
obligations on them.
Q.1) Lower contributions to employees’ state insurance could boost formalisation