Centre-RBI tussle: Balance of power, in
Mains Paper 1: Economy
Prelims level: Centre-RBI tussle
Mains level: Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization of
development and employment.
- The role of the Board of Directors of the Reserve Bank of India
(RBI) and its powers vis-à-vis the RBI Governor have come into focus in the
ongoing tussle between the Centre and the central bank.
- The Centre has hinted that it is examining the option of using the
powers of the RBI Board to override the Governor.
- There are several questions that arise from this unprecedented
attempt by the Centre to use powers under the Reserve Bank of India Act,
- The most important of these is: Where does the balance of power
lie between the Governor and the board? What is the legal position of the
board in relation to the Governor? Does the latter draw his powers from the
board as in a corporate set-up? Can the board give directions to the
Governor on issues of policy and management of the central bank?
Relationship between the board and the Governor
- The relationship between the board and the Governor is not
comparable to a corporate set-up where the managing director (the corporate
equivalent of the Governor) reports to the board and draws his powers from
- A managing director is an agent of the board in a company, in the
RBI, the Governor is not.
- He draws his powers from the RBI Act and not from the Board of
- He is appointed by the Prime Minister in consultation with the
- The RBI Board has no say whatsoever in his appointment. In a
company, the board of directors chooses one of its own to be appointed as
the managing director.
- In the RBI, the Governor secures board membership only after he is
appointed to the post.
- It is, thus, wrong to compare a corporate board to the RBI’s and
suggest that the Governor is subservient to it.
Constitution of the board
- As per the RBI Act, the board is made up of the following members:
the Governor and four Deputy Governors, four directors (one each from the
four regional boards of the RBI), 10 directors to be nominated by the
Centre, and one government official who is also to be nominated by the
- The present board is made up of 18 members, which is the Governor
and four Deputy Governors, four regional board members and nine nominees
from the Centre who include two officials, the Economic Affairs Secretary
and the Secretary, Department of Financial Services.
Balance of power
- The sections in the RBI Act dealing with this subject are rather
- Past Governors have interpreted Section 7, the relevant one, to
mean that the powers of the board and that of the Governor are concurrent.
- The Governor draws his powers from Section 7(3) of the Act. He can
exercise all powers and do all things that may be exercised and done by the
- This is subject to a caveat though. The board, under Section 58,
can make regulations that will give it the powers to override those of the
- The regulations have to be consistent with the provisions of the
RBI Act, which essentially means that the board has to act within the
framework of the Act.
- These regulations have to go through an elaborate approval process
before they become law (Section 58(4)).
- The board has to forward the regulations to the Centre, which will
have to table them in both Houses of Parliament.
- Members have a period of 30 days within which they can either
suggest modifications to the regulations or annul them.
- Section 7(1) which confers powers on the Centre to issue
directions to the RBI “from time to time” in the public interest after
consultations with the Governor.
- All bets will be off if this section is invoked as it will become
untenable for the Governor to continue in his position.
- This is the framework of the law but what has been the convention
- The RBI Board has always functioned in an advisory role with the
understanding that the Governor would consider its advice while making
- There was mutual respect between the board and the Governor, with
both operating in a spirit of accommodation.
- The fact is that neither Section 7(1) nor Section 7(3) has been
unleashed in the 83-year existence of the RBI. Not even when the RBI was
privately owned between 1935 and 1949.
What’s the difference between then and now?
- The short answer is that the spirit of accommodation, which flows
out of mutual respect and understanding of each other’s compulsions between
the RBI and the Centre, and which was evident then, is absent now.
- The blame for this has to be shared by the players involved in the
- It may not be very difficult for the Centre to have its way by
using the board’s powers to frame regulations overriding the Governor but
this will necessarily come with a price.
- Such a move will not only set a bad precedent but also lead to
several ticklish situations.
- There is a good reason why the RBI has been kept at arm’s length
from the Centre and bestowed with a certain independence.
- That is because the Centre is the spender and the RBI is the
creator of money, and there has to be a natural separation between the two.
- The Centre arming itself with powers to run the RBI runs afoul of
- Such a move by the Centre would be ill-advised and will take its
relations with the monetary authority into uncharted territory.
- There will be no winners in this dangerous game.
- Enough dirty linen has been washed in public in the past month and
it is time for the Centre and the RBI to behave like the mature entities
that they are, uphold time-tested conventions, and act with mutual respect
and a spirit of accommodation.
- The board meeting today, November 19, will set a crucial precedent
in the economic history of India, and one can only hope that it will be the
Q.1) Which of the following is used by the Reserve Bank of India to anchor
its monetary policy?
(a) CPI-Agricultural Labour
(b) CPI-Industrial Worker
(d) CPI (combined)
Q.1) Can the board give directions to the Governor on issues of policy and
management of the central bank?