THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 21 February 2020 (On Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill (The Hindu))

On Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill (The Hindu)

Mains Paper 2: Polity
Prelims level: Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill
Mains level: Significance of the Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill

Context:

  • The Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation (ART) Bill, which was cleared by the Union Cabinet this week, came after the Surrogacy Bill that it should have preceded.

Background:

  • Together, the ART Bill; the Surrogacy Bill; the amendment to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act; and the older Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act present a bouquet of legislation that will have a positive impact on the reproductive rights and choices of women in India.
  • The ART Bill to regulate clinics offering fertility treatments has been long in the works, and was first presented publicly way back in 2008.
  • ART measures help couples unable to conceive naturally to bear children with the aid of state-of-the-art technology to achieve pregnancy, leading to safe delivery.

History of the Assisted Reproductive Technology:

  • India has a rich history of employing ART, though the initial years went officially undocumented at that time. In the late 1970s, only months after the birth of Louise Brown, the first ‘test tube baby’, Kolkata-based doctor Subhas Mukherjee announced the birth of the world’s second test tube baby.
  • Subsequently, the industry saw phenomenal growth, as infertility rates went up.

Why regulation is important?

  • A market projection (by Fortune Business Insights) said the size of the ART market is expected to reach $45 billion by 2026. Among Asian countries, India’s ART market is pegged at third position.
  • A lack of regulation and the consequent laxity in operations drove a lot of traffic from other nations to India.
  • This, in turn, along with the relatively low costs, led to the mushrooming of ART clinics across the country. Undoubtedly, this also led to a plethora of legal, social and ethical issues.

Way ahead:

  • It is at this juncture that the ART Bill has seen a fitting revival, egged on by legislators who facilitated the passage of the Surrogacy Bill in the Rajya Sabha.
  • It seeks to regulate and monitor ART procedures, and mandates the establishment of a National Board and State Boards to lay down rules for implementation, and also honours a long-pending demand — creation of a national registry, and registration authority.
  • While the rules will handle the bells and whistles, the Bill already sets a comprehensive framework to operate on.
  • Most significantly, the Bill recommends punishment, even jail time, for violations of the provisions.

Conclusion:

Prelims Questions:

Q.1) With reference to the Supreme Court judgement on criminalization of politics, consider the following statements:
1. The criminal history of candidates for the Assembly and Lok Sabha elections should be published in a local and a national newspaper as well as the parties’ social media handles.
2. It should mandatorily be published either within 48 hours of the selection of candidates or less than two weeks before the first date for filing of nominations, whichever is earlier.

Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) None of the above

Ans: C
Mains Questions:
Q.1) What are the provisions highlighted in the Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill? Do you think the Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill is a much-needed complement to Surrogacy Bill? Critically comment.