THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 27 August 2019 (A bottom-up approach to conservation (The Hindu))
A bottom-up approach to conservation (The Hindu)
Mains Paper 3: Environment
Prelims level: Gadgil panel
Mains level: Highlights of the Gadgil panel’s suggestions
Context
- The repeat of landslides and consequent tragedies in Kerala this year too, after the rainfall, has caused much concern.
- The need for implementing the Gadgil panel’s suggestions is felt more important now than ever before.
What is the realisation with the recent floods?
- The 2018 floods and landslides in Kerala caused huge financial losses and manifold human tragedies.
- It was believed by many that the 2018 tragedy in Kerala marked a once-in-a-century calamity.
- The probability of two such back-to-back events was only 1 in 10,000. So, it was hoped that normalcy would return soon and people could return to business as usual.
- Hence, a repeat of intense floods, landslides, financial losses and manifold human tragedies in 2019 too was something people were unprepared for.
- The 2019 events have thus made people realise that it is unwise to continue business as usual.
- This has made them seriously consider the alternatives to deal with the calamities of nature.
What does the Gadgil panel report offer?
- One set of possibilities is provided by the recommendations of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) chaired by Madhav Gadgil.
- The policy prescriptions in the report were well within the framework of the constitutional mandates, and only suggested following the existing laws.
- This relates to environmental protection and devolution of powers, right down to the gram sabha and ward sabha level.
- In all, the WGEEP called for a model of conservation and development compatible with each other. The report sought a replacement of the prevailing ‘Develop Recklessly, Conserve Thoughtlessly’ pattern with one of ‘Develop Sustainably, Conserve Thoughtfully.’
- This fine-tuning of development practices to the local context would have required the full involvement of local communities.
- It would have therefore been inappropriate to depend exclusively on government agencies for deciding on and managing Ecologically Sensitive Zones (ESZs).
Recommendation on ESZs
- The WGEEP’s mandate asked the state to demarcate areas within the Western Ghats Region that need to be notified as ecologically sensitive.
- It was also asked to recommend for notification of such areas as ecologically sensitive zones under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
- In line with the National Forest Policy, the panel decided to assign 60% of the total area of Western Ghats in Kerala as a zone of highest ecological sensitivity, ‘ESZ1’.
- These included the region housing wildlife sanctuaries and national parks.
- The panel proposed ‘elevation’ and ‘slope’ as two key indicators of sensitivity.
- In Kerala, rainfall increases rapidly with elevation, and high rainfall and steep slopes render localities vulnerable to landslides.
- Hence, areas prone to landslides would come under ESZ1.
- The extent and quality of natural vegetation was the third indicator for classifying an area as ESZ1.
- Landslides are under control in areas with intact natural vegetation because the roots bind the soil.
- Any disturbance to such vegetation would render any locality that has steep slopes and experiences high rainfall susceptible to landslides.
- Such disturbances may include , quarrying or mining, replacement of natural vegetation by new plantations, leveling of the land using heavy machinery, construction of houses and roads.
- Therefore, it was recommended that such activities be avoided in ESZ1 areas.
How successful is Kerala in devolution of powers?
- The Plachimada Panchayat of Kerala cancelled Coca-Cola company’s licence.
- This was because the company polluted and depleted groundwater reserves, drying up wells and adversely impacting agriculture and livelihoods.
- While doing so, the panchayat invoked its constitutional rights, arguing that it had the duty to protect the well-being of its citizens.
- It thus claimed that it had the right to cancel or refuse permission for anything that affected its citizens adversely.
- The company’s counterargument was that the panchayat was subordinate to the State government, which had granted it the licence.
- The Kerala High Court rejected this contention, affirming that grass-roots institutions have the authority to decide on the development course in their own locality.
- Furthermore, the Kerala legislature unanimously passed a law asking Coca-Cola to pay Plachimada Panchayat due compensation for losses inflicted on them.
What is the way forward?
- Democracy is not merely voting once in 5 years; it is the active involvement of citizens in governing the country at all levels, especially at the local level.
- The powers and responsibilities conferred under provisions such as the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, and the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 should be fully utilised.
- The ruling that local bodies have the authority to decide on the development course in their own localities be made operational across the country.
- Implementation of the Gadgil panel recommendations would have definitely helped manage better the heavy rainfall, and reduce the extent and intensity of landslides.
- It is only wise to apply the panel’s recommendations at least now.
Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam
General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials
Prelims Questions:
Q.1) Consider the following statements:
1. The maximum gap between two sessions of Parliament cannot be more than
six months.
2. The Speaker from time to time summons each House of Parliament to meet.
3. A ‘session’ of Parliament is the period spanning between the first sitting of
a House and its prorogation (or dissolution in the case of the LokSabha).
Which of the above statements are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1 and 3 only
(c) 2 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3