Sample Material of Public Administration Study Kit: State Government and Administration: Directorates
Sample Material of Public Administration Study Kit (Paper - II)
State Government and Administration: Directorates
DIRECTORATES
The secretariat is concerned with setting the boarder polices and goals of the State Government while the responsibility for achieving those policies and executing those policies rests with the heads of the executive departments. The executive agencies are as a rule of located outside the secretariat and constitute distinct organisational entities.
Nomenclature A popular label to identity an executive agency
of ‘Directorate’ Many examples of this could be cited—Director of Agriculture,
director of Animal Husbandry, Director of College Education, Director of Social
Welfare and so on. However, other nomenclatures are also used to refer to the
head of the executive departments. Thus, the executive head of the department of
police is known as Director General of Police; that
of the jail department, the Inspector General of Jails; that of the forest
department, the Chief Conservator of Forests; that of the cooperative
department, the Register of Cooperative Societies; that of the sale-tax; that of
the public works department, the Chief Engineer; that of the printing and
stationery department, the Controller and so forth. In other words, although in
a large number of cases the head of the executive department are
called directors, they are also known by other names.
Organisation
Apart from state level, the executive agencies also function
at the substantial levels. When this is done, lesser directorates emerge at the
regional level. When this process goes further down the line, the district,
block and village level field agencies of a directorate emerge. Through the
creation of field agencies, the administration is able to reach the doorsteps of
the people its serves. At the state level, the headship would normally be with a
‘full’ director who would be assisted by additional directors, joint directors,
deputy directors assistant directors and other functionaries. The regional level
set up of an executive department would usually be headed by
an officer of a lower rank, a senior joint director/ joint or even with lower
rank. Many district level officers of the executive departments are headed by
deputy or even assistant directors.Functions of the Department/DirectorateGenerally,
the Head of the Department is responsible for the following functions:
-
Formulation of Departmental budget;
-
Acting as technical adviser to the Minister;
-
Inspection of the execution of work of departmental district staff;
-
Allocation of grants according to rules, making budget reappropriation within limits;
-
Making within approved rules all appointments, confirmations, postings, transfers, promotions of all subordinate officers including also sanctioning of leave and making acting arrangements;
Relationship between the Secretariat and Field Departments Any form of government organisation must be based on three essential components-theminister or the political head, the secretary or the administrative head and the head of the executive agency called by various names such as Department, Directorate, Inspectorate, etc. In the interest of good administration it is essential that the respective functions of the three components should be broadly distinguished and defined and all must obviously work in the closest touch with each other. This describes the ideal relationship which should be maintained during normal times.However, in times of emergency and crisis the relationship is naturally disturbed and with the centralisation of authority the secretariat tends to become powerful. The relationship between the secretariat and the field agencies is a problem in state administration that has led to much discussion; debate and controversy and all committees/commissions appointed in recent years to recommend reforms in state governments have given due attention to this problem and made necessary recommendations. These suggestions vary all the way from a radical organisational overhaul to minor procedural changes. The need today is for a clearcut demarcation of functions between the secretariat and the executive departments. The secretariat should concern itself mainly with issues of policy leaving its implementation to the field agencies and exercising only a supervisory and coordinating role.
Flowing from the above suggestions is the need for liberal delegation of authority from the secretariat to the executive agencies. Since the responsibility of the examination of government policies rests with the heads of departments, it is essential that they should be given adequate powers and discretion to act effectively and exercise initiative. All reports on Administrative Reforms are agreed on the need for it. But, while some increased delegations have been made in some states in recent years, the overall approach has been one of hesitancy and caution. Delegations are often made piecemeal and with reservations and are hedged in by restrictions of various kinds.”
