Justice Must Reach the Poor
When Sir Elijah Impey enthroned himself on the coveted
position of the Chief Justice of Supreme Court in 1773; the journey of the
dispensation of justice in ‘modern’ India began. Obviously, this does not imply
the nonexistence of justice, more so; propoor justice in pre-modern India. Who
will not reminisce the evolution of the Indian Judicial system since the era of
the nomadic communities in the Rig Vedic period to the individual brilliance of
Jehangir in the form of Janzeer-i-adl. The Judicial system in India had been
well structured, though at times reaching the zenith of glory or the abyss of
disgrace during the periods of individual feudal lords, kings or emperors.
Nevertheless, till the advent of the concepts of Western
Democracy and Justice, probably there was no serious thought regarding “Justice”
to be ‘just’ !! Since antiquity, justice in India (if not in the rest of the
world too) practically was viewed as the decrees bestowed on the society by a
privileged lot, the lot being the Brahmins, the Kings, the Ulemas or the
Badshahs, including the regional variations of these nomenclatures. Whether it
was the Manusmriti or the Quran, whether it was the Temple Priest or the Qazi,
on the majority of occasions, Justice in India had been the prerogative of a
coterie.
So, when the Supreme Court in Calcutta (now Kolkata) was set
up as one of the provisions of the Regulating Act (1773), it must have evoked a
response of gayness, at least amongst the progressive denizens of the city. But
soon it was to falter in its objective of being a “Court of Equity” as Nand
Kumar was denied access to ‘just’ “Justice”. With time, Indians overcame the
initial mesmerization regarding the British system of Justice when the Ilbert
Bill was vehemently opposed and not put into effect! Hence historically, Justice
was belied, if not denied, to the native Indians, probably because of racial
arrogance of the Britishers or due to the very nature of Justice itself !
Indians at that period, meant Indians of all variety, whether rich or poor.
With the dawn of independence, the free Indians dreamt of a
different society altogether, far from the clutches of foreign oppression and
closer to the Utopia of social integration. But whether free India has really
been able to cherish her dreams of pluralism and justice through its arduous
journey in the last six decades still remains a matter of debate. Probably the
starting point of the ‘goof up’ had been the rampant imposition of the British
system of Justice on a society which was hardly aware of it, either from the
point of view of the concept, or from the perspective of language.
Moreover, Indians never did a Phoenix act in regard to our
struggle for independence which meant that the masses were in oblivion of the
romantic ideas of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity and for that matter,
Justice. Nor were we well accustomed to Socialism and Social Justice; the rights
of the proletariat and the farmers being out of question.