Rural India’s ignored air pollution
Mains Paper: 3 | Environment
Prelims level: Air Pollution
Mains level: Air pollution awareness
The Supreme Court-appointed Environment Pollution
Control Authority has put out, given the steadily deteriorating air quality
in the capital.
India’s air pollution issue comes off as a peculiarly
The World Health Organization’s Air Pollution and Child
Health: Prescribing Clean Air report released earlier this week underlines the
fact that this is not so.
The main sources of air pollution may vary from urban to
rural areas, but no area is, strictly speaking, safer.
Analysing the effects of air pollution
India had almost 61,000 deaths of children under five
years due to ambient and household pollution.
This is the most deaths globally in this age bracket.
In the under 14 bracket, it had over 100,000 deaths.
The numbers are partly a function of India’s population
size; a handful of other countries have higher mortality rates. But this is only
part of the problem.
For other children who are exposed to dangerous levels of
air pollution in India which is 98% or so of them the issue links to a number of
long-term physical and mental developmental problems.
It is also connected with the country’s shifting
epidemiological profile, feeding into the rise of non-communicable diseases such
as cardiovascular conditions and cancer.
This is as much or more a rural issue; of the 1.1 million
air pollution-related deaths in 2015, 75% were in rural India.
In 2003, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
issued guidelines for ambient air quality monitoring.
They differentiated between the types of pollution
affecting urban and rural areas. When it comes to the latter, the guidelines
focus entirely on indoor air pollution.
The use of biomass fuels for indoor cooking, heating and
light is a significant problem, true enough.
In every winter, the Indo-Gangetic plains, housing nearly
a third of India’s population, are blanketed with a thick layer of ambient
Stubble burning, brick kilns, coal-fired factories and
woodfires for heat all contribute.
The problem is that of the 600-plus air quality monitoring
stations the CPCB set up across the country, there are none in rural areas.
Initiatives taken by the government
The draft National Clean Air Programme put out earlier
this year was an opportunity to plug the gaps.
The programme aims to expand the monitoring network to
include 50 rural areas with at least one monitoring station each.
This is a start at best; at least 1,200 are needed to
present an accurate spatial picture of rural air quality.
The original draft in March also had quantitative emission
and sectoral targets. By April, these had been dropped.
There is also little detail on how violations of existing
emission norms should be addressed.
The programme doesn’t envisage any cooperation and
coordination across crucial ministries such as health, transport and energy.
In effect, what should have been the first comprehensive
framework for addressing ambient air pollution across the country seems to have
little more in mind than the first step in the process data collection.
Addressing this will not be easy; the economics of it
is just one aspect.
Empirical evidence from rural India shows that the energy
ladder hypothesis households move towards modern energy sources as their incomes
rise often doesn’t hold.
A number of other factors are in the mix.
The number of educated females between 10 and 50 years of
age and the household’s level of education had a positive and significant impact
on the probability of using clean cooking fuels in rural India.
The size of the household is another factor. ,
The education plays a role here; the National Family
Health Survey 2015-16 showed that higher education levels lead to later and
Q.1) Which among the following are forms of secondary
2. Ground level ozone
3. Acid Rain
Select the correct answer using the code given below.
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 2 and 3 only
(c) 1 and 3 only
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Q.1) To counter air pollution; the governments must issues an awareness
among the rural households too. Analyse the statement.