THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 12 october 2019 (Economic slowdown may be structural, not cyclical (Indian Express))
Economic slowdown may be structural, not cyclical (Indian Express)
Mains Paper 3: Economy
Prelims level: Cyclical slowdowns
Mains level: Arguments behind the slowdown being structural
Context
- India is in the middle of a sharp growth slowdown.
- The debate surrounding the slowdown is whether it is a cyclical downturn or a structural correction.
- Diagnosing the problem is key for devising policy responses.
Cyclical slowdowns
- Cyclical slowdowns can be dealt with using temporary fiscal and monetary stimulus.
- Structural problems, on the other hand, require long-run policy responses.
Arguments behind the slowdown being structural
- Most of the growth between 2014 and 2017 was sparked by a sharp increase in government spending.
- Given India’s oil imports, the decline in the world price of oil by almost USD 50 a barrel between 2014 and 2016 represented a windfall revenue gain of 3 per cent of GDP.
- Since the fiscal deficit barely moved, the government effectively used the windfall to finance various government schemes.
- Now that oil prices have reverted towards their previous levels, maintaining a stable fiscal deficit has necessitated a reduction in government expenditures.
- If there is absent the oil windfall, Indian growth over this period would have been 2-3 percentage points lower annually.
- The economic slowdown has been ongoing for almost four years now.
- Cyclical downturns last a few quarters, maybe a year. Negative growth pressures for four years indicate structural problems.
Structural slowdown needs investment demand
- The period 2016-2018, a number of commentators and industry representatives kept up a drumbeat of criticism of the Monetary Policy Committee’s refusal to cut rates.
- The argument was that high real interest rates, along with the restrictions imposed by the Reserve Bank of India on banks’ lending in order to deal with the NPA problem, were jointly responsible for low investment demand.
- Since the beginning of 2019, both the monetary policy stance as well as the Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) norms have been relaxed by the RBI.
- However, investment demand has barely moved in response.
How to deal with structural slowdown?
- To dealing with structural problems doesn’t require fiscal spending. Instead, it involves non-pecuniary costs.
- The government has to expend some of its considerable political capital in order to usher in long-term labour and land reforms.
- These aren’t easy because the state governments have to be roped in to get these reforms going.
Lowering corporate tax rate
- The move to lower the corporate tax rate is a good one. It has the characteristic of a capital market structural reform as long as it is not used as a temporary fiscal measure.
- The government needs to signal unambiguously to markets that this is a permanent reduction of the base rate.
- The uncertainty surrounding the longevity of the tax cut will undo a lot of its potential upside.
To improve financial infrastructure
- The financial infrastructure within which the economy operates is another key structural bottleneck that needs to be addressed.
- The public sector banking network which accounts for 75 per cent of India’s banking assets.
- Public sector banks introduce two complications to the financial system.
- First, they allow for capture of the credit allocation system by non-market forces.
- Second, since the regulator of banks is the RBI which is itself owned by the government, this amounts to the regulator regulating the entity that it itself is reporting to. This system is subject to regulatory capture.
- The government can induce regulatory changes by just changing the personnel it appoints to the upper management of the RBI or to its board, a scenario that played out in gory detail over the last year.
- India needs to urgently begin reducing the importance of public sector banks in the economy.
- This can be done either through privatisation of existing public sector banks or through the granting of banking licenses to private operators.
- On-tap banking licenses on offer have attracted little interest so far suggests that the privatisation of public sector banks needs to be prioritised.
Issuing sovereign bonds
- The idea needs to be pursued for multiple reasons.
- First, sovereign bonds would force government debt to be priced in a more competitive setting. Currently, it is priced in a sheltered domestic bond market.
- Second, issuing sovereign bonds will force greater clarity and transparency of macroeconomic data since international creditors will demand that.
- Things like failure to achieve policy targets or reticence in releasing data will attract rapid punishment by markets. This fear will provide greater discipline to policymaking.
Way forward
- The government would also do well to revisit the appointments process to key technical and regulatory bodies.
- Functions like monetary policy, banking supervision, data collection and dissemination, audit of government financial accounts, are all technical jobs need to be independent of government direction.
- Appointing career bureaucrats with little to no domain training or
background to run them doesn’t help in either facilitating functional
competence or in signaling the independence of these institutions from
government control. Domain competence needs to be prioritised.
Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam
General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials
Prelims Questions:
Q.1) Consider following statements regarding Common Service Centres (CSC)
scheme
1. CSCs are the access points for delivery of essential public utility
services, social welfare schemes, healthcare, financial, education and
agriculture services, apart from host of B2C services to citizens in rural and
remote areas of the country.
2. It is a pan-India network catering to regional, geographic, linguistic and
cultural diversity of the country, thus enabling the Government’s mandate of a
socially, financially and digitally inclusive society.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 Nor 2