Preventing mob lynching (The Hindu)
Mains Paper 2:- Social Justice
Prelims level:- Mob lynching laws
Mains level:- Welfare scheme for vulnerable sections of the society
- The spate of incidents of lynching over the past few years has led to a
heightened sense of insecurity among the marginalised communities. Though no
data has been compiled by the NCRB of the number of cases of lynching in the
country since 2015 for reasons unknown, the figures reported by various
sections of the media are troubling.
The Supreme Court Judgement in 2018:
- In 2018, the Supreme Court described lynching as a “horrendous act of
- The Court exhorted the Centre and State governments to frame laws
specifically to deal with the crime of lynching.
- The Courtlaid down certain guidelines to be incorporated in these laws
including fast-track trials, compensation to victims, and disciplinary
action against lax law-enforcers.
- The Manipur government came up first with its Bill against lynching in
2018, incorporating some logical and relevant clauses.
- The Bill specified that there would be nodal officers in each district
to control such crimes.
- Police officers who fail to prevent the crime of lynching in their
jurisdiction are liable to be imprisoned for a term that may extend from one
to three years with a fine limit of ₹50,000.
- No concurrence of the State government is required to prosecute them for
dereliction of duty.
- The Rajasthan government passed a bill against lynching in August 2019.
- However, not only has the government accepted only a few guidelines
issued by the apex court, but is also silent on any action to be initiated
against police officers who may be accused of dereliction of duty.
- West Bengal came up with a more stringent Bill against lynching.
Punishment for lynching to death is punishable with the death penalty or
life imprisonment and a fine of up to ₹5 lakh.
- West Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar has invited the Chief Minister and
leaders of all legislature parties for a meeting this month to discuss the
Bill. Most other guidelines of the Supreme Court have been adopted by the
What the Centre can do?
- The Centre would do well to incorporate sections in the law for penal
action against doctors who stand accused of dereliction of duty, for delay
in attending to victims of lynching, or submitting false reports without
carrying out a proper and thorough medical examination of the victims,
either under coercion by the police or due to their own prejudice against
the community or religion of the victims.
- Under the compensation scheme for the victims, the amount to be paid to
the victims should be recovered from the perpetrators of the crime or
collective fines be imposed on the villagers where the lynching takes place.
- Punitive action to be taken against police officers accused of
dereliction of duty.
- The Central law too as it would deter police officials acting in a
partisan manner in favour of the lynch mob.
- To framing the laws, the Centre could even provide for punitive action
against political leaders found guilty of inciting mobs.
- Until a zero-tolerance attitude is adopted in dealing with mob lynching,
this crime will continue to show a rising trend.
Q1. With reference to the ‘Levels and Trends in Child Mortality’ report,
consider the following statements:
1. It was released by the United Nations (UN) inter-agency group for child
2. India is among the few countries in the world where, in 2018, the mortality
for girls under 5 years of age exceeded that of boys.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Q1. Supreme Court described lynching as a ‘horrendous act of mobocracy’. The
Supreme Court has laid down guidelines for prevention of Mob violence and
Lynching against any caste or community in this regard. What are the initiatives
taken based on these guidelines at the level of Centre and the States? Discuss