THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 21 August 2020 A losing proposition: On sons of the soil and jobs(The Hindu)

A losing proposition: On sons of the soil and jobs(The Hindu)

Mains Paper 2:Governance
Prelims level: Right to freedom
Mains level: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation

Context:

India has seen many versions of the ‘sons of the soil’ argument over decades.
Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister’s announcement that only those domiciled there would be eligible for government jobs in the State is not unique in that sense.

Nativism:

At the same time, it denotes a certain mainstreaming of nativism that more parties and States appear to be adopting.
Mr. Chouhan’s announcement was packaged as a promise to the youths of the State, but in reality, it is a sign of gloom.
Regional parties have always focused on local sentiments, but what is notable in recent years is the BJP and the Congress too jumping on the bandwagon.
The Congress in Madhya Pradesh is supporting the move, and in Maharashtra, it is part of the ruling coalition led by the Shiv Sena which is pushing measures to give priority to locals in employment in the private sector.
Similar moves from States such as Karnataka, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Haryana and Telangana in recent years to introduce various types of domicile eligibility for job seekers, in private and government jobs, have either been abortedor had limited outcomes.
But measures that raise artificial barriers go against the grain of national integration, which includes market integration.

Exaggeration:

There are regional particularities to be considered, nevertheless.
Some States require a certain proficiency in the local language to be employed in government jobs, which is for administrative reasons.
There are also restrictions on movement of people into tribal areas of India. These are exceptions provided in the legal and constitutional scheme of India to manage its remarkable diversity.
Inciting local passions in order to divert public attention from the real challenge of generating employment for the country’s swelling youth population falls in a different realm.
Migrant populations fulfil a market demand created by gaps in skills and preferences.
That is one reason why government orders and even laws of the past in several places that mandated quotas for locals in employment were not enforced.
The spectre of locals losing out to migrants is hugely exaggerated and often designed to beguilethe people.
In Gujarat, politicians including those of the ruling BJP continue to raise a hue and cryfor a domicile quota of 85% in the private sector workforce whereas the government data showed in 2017 that 92% of it was local already.

Conclusion:

India has a severe unemployment crisis and efforts that match the challenge are badly needed.
Nativism is not a part of the solution. In fact, it can aggravate the crisis by creating a hostile environment to investment, growth and employment generation.
Nativism is not a solution to India’s growing unemployment crisis
Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

E-Books Download for UPSC IAS Exams

General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Material

Prelims Questions:

Q.1)With reference to the “Ayush for Immunity” campaign, consider the following statements:

1. The theme of campaign is accessible and affordable health for all, through Ayush solutions.
2. It is conducted through Ayush Virtual Convention Centre (AVCC), the new digital communication platform of the Ministry.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: C