Why EU Green Deal matters (Indian Express)

• Mains Paper 3: Environment 
• Prelims level: EU Green Deal
• Mains level:  EU climate action plan

Context:

• The annual climate talks ended in Madrid last week with a disappointing outcome. 
• The talks were unable to define the rules of a new carbon market to be set up under the Paris Agreement, the only major agenda before it. 
• Nor were they able to persuade countries to commit to increase the scale of climate actions by next year, a demand being made again and again in view of scientific assessments that show that current efforts to tackle climate change were not enough.

Why EU Green Deal matters? 

• The European Union, whose 28 member countries are together the third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world after China and the United States, came up with an announcement on additional measures it would on climate change. 
• Called the European Green Deal, the EU announcement was hailed as a major step forward, even though it needs complementary efforts from other countries to make a significant impact.

The two key decisions

• Two major decisions are at the heart of the European Green Deal. One is about achieving “climate neutrality”. 
• The EU has promised to bring a law, binding on all member countries, to ensure it becomes “climate neutral” by 2050.
• Climate neutrality, sometimes also expressed as a state of net-zero emissions, is achieved when a country’s emissions are balanced by absorptions and removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. 
• Absorption can be increased by creating more carbon sinks like forests, while removal involves technologies like carbon capture and storage.
• The EU is now the first major emitter to agree to the 2050 climate neutrality target. It has said it would bring a proposal by March next year on a European law to enshrine this target.

Increase emission reduction target:

• The second decision pertains to an increase in its 2030 emission reduction target. 
• In its climate action plan declared under the Paris Agreement, the EU was committed to making a 40 per cent reduction in its emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. 
• It is now promising to increase this reduction to at least 50 per cent and work towards 55 per cent.
• Even at 40 per cent, the European Union had the most ambitious emission reduction targets among the developed countries. 
• The US had agreed to cut emissions by 26-28 per cent by 2030 from 2005 levels, but having withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, it is under no obligation to fulfill even that target.
• The EU also happens to be only one among major emitters to retain the 1990 baseline for emission cuts, originally mandated under the Kyoto Protocol for all developed countries. 
• Most other countries have shifted their baselines to 2005 or even later under the 2015 Paris Agreement.
• The Green Deal includes sectoral plans to achieve these two overall targets, and proposals for the policy changes that would be required. 

Better than others

• The European Union, as a whole, has been doing better than other developed countries on reducing emissions. 
• In 2010, the EU had pledged to reduce its emissions by at least 25 per cent by 2020 from 1990 levels. 
• By 2018, it claimed to have achieved 23 per cent reduction in emissions. In terms of emission reductions, it probably is on track to meet the 2020 target, unlike any developed country outside the EU.
• Canada, which walked out of the Kyoto Protocol, reported last year that its emissions were down 4 per cent from 2005 levels, but compared to 1990, this was an addition of about 16 per cent. 
• Japan, another country to have abandoned the Kyoto Protocol, said its emissions for the year ending March 31, 2018 had come to about 8 per cent below the 2013 baseline it has chosen for itself. But this is a miniscule decrease compared to 1990 levels.

Way ahead:

• The Green Deal is important but inadequate in itself to achieve the emission reductions that scientific assessments say would be required to save the world from catastrophic and irreversible impacts of climate change. 
• There has been no signal from other big emitters, including large developing countries like China and India, that they were considering immediate scaling up of their climate actions.

Conclusion:

• As long as many international partners do not share the same ambition as the EU, there is a risk of carbon leakage, either because production is transferred from the EU to other countries with lower ambition for emission reduction, or because EU products are replaced by more carbon-intensive imports. 
• If this risk materializes, there will be no reduction in global emissions, and this will frustrate the efforts of EU and its industries to meet the global climate objectives of the Paris Agreement.

Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions: 

Q.1) With reference to the Global Sulphur cap complaint fuel oil, consider the following statements:

1. International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations to reduce sulphur oxides (SOx) emissions from ships first came into force in 2005, under Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (known as the MARPOL Convention). 
2. From 1 January 2020, the limit for sulphur in fuel oil used on board ships operating outside designated emission control areas will be reduced to 0.50% m/m (mass by mass). 

Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) None of the above

Ans: C

Mains Questions:

Q.1) The European Union has come up with a climate action plan when the global climate talks failed to reach key objectives. In this context, what is the EU’s plan? How does it compare to others’, and how much remains to be done?