THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 24 January 2020 (Needless impatience: On Centre’s plea on death row convicts )
Needless impatience: On Centre’s plea
on death row convicts
Mains Paper 3:
Prelims level :
Mains level :
The Centre’s application in the Supreme Court for additional guidelines
regarding the execution of condemned prisoners betrays a needless impatience
to hang the four convicts facing the gallows for the rape and murder of
‘Nirbhaya’ in 2012.
The Ministry of Home Affairs essentially seeks the incorporation of
measures aimed at reducing the scope for death row convicts to adopt
Demanding speedy punishment process:
These guidelines were undoubtedly aimed at protecting the constitutional
rights of prisoners in the context of a sound body of jurisprudence that
maintains that such rights extend right up to the moment of their execution.
The court was anxious about enforcing their right to be informed about
the scope for filing petitions for clemency, for being given legal
assistance in drafting them, and for exploring judicial remedies even after
their appeals for mercy are rejected.
Further, the 14-day time lag between the closure of the clemency route
and their hanging is aimed at preventing secret executions.
The court was concerned about the right of the convicts’ family members
to be informed, as well as the time needed by the prisoners for settling
their affairs and preparing themselves mentally.
It is strange that the government wants the Supreme Court to frame a
rule imposing a seven-day limit on the time that convicts have to file a
mercy petition after a death warrant is issued.
And that courts, governments and prison authorities should all be
mandated to issue death warrants within seven days of the rejection of mercy
petitions and to carry out the sentence within seven days thereafter.
To believe that these are matters that contribute to substantive delay
in carrying out death sentences is misconceived.
Nothing prevents the government from introducing rules to address such
On the need for a time limit for filing curative petitions, the
government is right in believing that the absence of such a stipulation
gives scope for convicts in the same case to take turns to file such
However, there is no sign that the apex court delays disposal of
curative petitions. If and when one is filed, it results in no more than a
few days’ delay.
In a country that unfortunately retains the death penalty, there is no
excuse for delaying the disposal of any petition, either in court, or before
Nor is there any need to expedite executions by revisiting sound
guidelines. As the death penalty is limited to the “rarest of rare” cases,
nothing is lost if those facing execution are allowed to exhaust all
What do you mean by the curative petition? What are the significance for a