How India can become self-reliant (Indian Express)

Mains Paper 2:National
Prelims level: Personal protective equipment
Mains level: Significant government reinvestment in public sector undertakings and research and development

Context:

• Addressing the nation on the COVID-19 pandemic, Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasised the necessity of a self-reliant. India.
• He said the need was brought home by the absence of domestic production of personal protective equipment (PPE) when COVID-19 struck, but India initiated and quickly ramped up PPE production.
• Mr. Modi said there needs to be improvement in quality and domestic supply chains going forward.
• If this is to happen though, India will have to make major course changes in development strategies.
• Much has changed since the self-reliance model of the Nehruvian era, so a perspective for Indian self-reliance in science and technology and industry in a globalised world is long overdue.

Not Globally competitive:

• Self-reliance in state-run heavy industries and strategic sectors in the decades following independence had placed India ahead of most developing countries.
• In the 1970s and 80s, however, India ............................................................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

Missing out on third Industrial Revolution:

• India completely missed out on the ‘third industrial revolution’ comprising electronic goods, micro-processors, personal computers, mobile phones and decentralised manufacturing and global value chains during the so-called lost decade(s).
• Today, India is the world’s second largest smartphone market.
• However, it does not make any of these phones itself, and manufactures only a small fraction of solar photovoltaic cells and modules currently used, with ambitious future targets.\
• At the turn of the millennium, India embarked on liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation.
• The very concept of self-reliance was rubbished, in the belief that it was tantamount to reinventing the wheel when advanced technologies could simply be bought from anywhere at lower costs.

Two related ideas have prevailed since then, and neither delivered the desired results:

First Idea:

• The first was that public sector undertakings (PSUs) are, by definition, inefficient and sluggishfor the competitive globalised scenario.
• No effort was made to engendereither real autonomy or a transition to new technological directions.
• Instead, PSUs with capability and scale for the task were undermined or abandoned, along with many nascent research and development efforts.
• On the other hand, the private sector displayed little interest in these heavy industries and showed no appetitefor technology upgradation.
• With entry of foreign corporations, most Indian private companies retreated into technology imports or collaborations.
• Even today, most research and development in India is conducted by PSUs, and much of the smaller but rising proportion of private sector research and development is by foreign corporations in information technology and biotechnology/pharma.
• Given the disinclination of most of the private sector towards research and development and high-tech manufacturing, significant government reinvestment in PSUs and research and development is essential for self-reliance.

Second Idea:

• The second idea was that inviting foreign direct investment and manufacturing by foreign majors would bring new technologies into India’s industrial ecosystem, obviatingthe need for indigenous efforts towards self-reliance.
• However, mere setting up of manufacturing facilities in India is no guarantee of absorption of technologies.
• There is no evidence from any sector that this has taken place or has even been attempted.
• The fact is, foreign majors jealously guard commercially significant or strategic technologies in off-shore manufacturing bases.
• The key problem of self-reliance is therefore neither external finance nor domestic off-shore manufacturing, but resolute indigenous endeavour including research and development.

Other Countries in Asia:

• Experience and achievements in other countries in Asia attest to this, and also contradict the notion that self-reliance is a hangover from Nehruvian ‘socialism’.
• Learning from Japan’s post-war success, countries like South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong took huge technological and industrial strides in the 1970s and 80s.
• South Korea, in particular, climbed ............................................................................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

CHINA:

• China is, of course, unique in scale and in its determination to become a superpower not just geopolitically but also in self-reliant S&T and industrial capability.
• China advanced purposefully from low-end mass manufacturing to a dominant role in global supply chains.
• It has now decided on shifting to advanced manufacturing and has set itself a target of becoming a world leader by 2035 in 5G, supercomputing, Internet of Things, artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous vehicles, biotech/pharma and other technologies of the ‘fourth industrial revolution’.

Way ahead:

• Unfortunately, India may well have missed the bus in many of these technologies in which the U.S., Europe and China have established perhaps insurmountableleads.
• Yet self-reliant capabilities in electric and fuel cell vehicles, electricity storage systems, solar cells and modules, aircraft including UAVs, AI, robotics and automation, biotech/pharma and others are well within reach.
• Large-scale concerted endeavours would, however, be required, since self-reliance will not happen by itself.
• State-funded research and development, including in basic research, by PSUs and research institutions and universities needs to be scaled-up significantly, well above the dismal 1% of GDP currently.
• Upgraded and reoriented PSUs would also be crucial given their distinctive place in the ecosystem.
• Private sector delivery-oriented research and development could also be supported, linked to meaningful participation in manufacturing at appropriate levels of the supply chain.

Conclusion:

• Finally, India’s meagre public expenditure on education needs to be substantially ramped up, including in skill development.
• And no country has developed without a much stronger public health system than what we have in India.

Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1)With reference to the CoAST India (Collaboration/Covid Action Support Group), consider the following statements:
1. The platform, a collaboration with Anand-based Forest Ecological Security (FES) as its main nodal point, is called CoAST India.
2. It is a GIS-enabled dashboard that includes an India map reflecting the movement of migrants in real time on their long journeys, along with facilities and relief organisations on their routes.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: ...........................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

Mains Questions:
Q.1)To what extent there needs to be significant government ...........................................................