In his second term, Modi can ensure better urbanisation through greater devolution of power, and finances (Indian Express)

Mains Paper 2 : Polity
Prelims level : Not much
Mains level : Urbanisation development

Context

•  As Prime Minister Narendra Modi begins his second term with an even larger political mandate, it is time to reflect on what should be the priorities in fixing our cities.
•  The scale of the challenge is massive whether we look at the availability of clean drinking water, unpolluted air, quality of public transport, traffic management and parking, integrated planning of transport and land use, law and order, management and safe disposal of solid waste that is generated, treatment of waste water and effluents, and affordable housing.
•  In short, the state of public service delivery in our cities is abysmal and what is more, the cities are financially broke and cannot address these problems on their own.

Do cities matter?

•  The short answer is, very much so.
•  Rapid economic growth in any country is associated with a decline in the share of agriculture and increase in the shares of manufacturing and services in its GDP, and this involves greater urbanisation.
•  India’s experience in the last two decades has been no different, except that the urbanisation associated with rapid growth has been largely unplanned, much more so than in most other developing countries aspiring to middle-income status.
•  Going forward, as we try to achieve rapid growth which is necessary to provide growing employment opportunities for our young work-force, we need to position our cities as drivers of the structural transformation of the Indian economy.

UN projections suggestions

•  UN projections suggest that India’s urban population will increase from 461 million in 2018 to 877 million in 2050, with India contributing the largest share of global urban population growth from 2018 to 2050.
•  Our cities will have to provide much better quality of life if we want to create a climate which will attract investment.
•  For this, we not only need more and better urban infrastructure but also significantly better institutions, which can manage the infrastructure and deliver public services of high quality.
•  State governments have the principal responsibility for urban development.
•  But in order to deliver, they can and should ensure that city governments are sufficiently empowered to get the job done.
•  This requires strengthening the finances of these governments, building their capacity to take on the new challenges that urbanisation brings, and providing an enabling environment through legislative and administrative support. Most state governments have been failing in this respect.

No transformative action

•  The 74th Constitutional Amendment of 1992 gives the state governments the power to transfer a set of 18 legitimate municipal functions to the municipal governments and also devolve finances to them to enable them to perform these functions and organise the delivery of the public services.
•  State governments were happy to devolve most, though not all, of the 18 functions to the urban local governments.
•  Town planning the golden goose was not typically transferred.
•  Also, action on devolution of funds to urban local governments has been unpredictable and hopelessly inadequate.

Fiscal devolution

•  The talk of cooperative federalism stops at the level of the state government.
•  Over the years, the state governments have claimed and successfully obtained a larger share in the joint revenues of the Centre and the states.
•  The Fourteenth Finance Commission increased the share of states in the revenue pool from 32 per cent to 42 per cent.
•  By contrast, municipal revenues/expenditures in India have been stagnating at around 1 per cent of GDP for over a decade.
•  This is much lower, for example, than the municipal revenues/expenditures in Brazil which account for 7.4 per cent of GDP and 6 per cent in South Africa.
•  The 15th Finance Commission has an opportunity to prescribe grants from the Centre to the urban local governments.

Steps taken by the Centre

•  In the past decade or so, the Centre has come to recognise that urbanisation is set to accelerate with India’s rapid growth.
•  First, the UPA government launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) and Rajiv Awas Yojana as centrally sponsored schemes.
•  The NDA government followed up with a number of their own urban development missions like Swachh Bharat, AMRUT, Smart Cities Mission, and Housing for All.
•  These national initiatives have provided some finance and also nudged the state governments to take up the challenges of urban development, and all this made some difference.
•  An important point to note is that the national missions could deliver only where the state governments were pro-active in bringing about the change.
•  While being aspirational and providing strategic leadership, these missions put forth only limited funds and rightly expected the state governments to raise the rest by either mobilising their own financial resources or by attracting public-private partnerships.
•  Only a few state governments have been able to come forward to realise the potential offered by the national missions.
•  The missions played an additional role in igniting a competitive spirit among the state governments in the delivery of public services.

Loopholes

•  A major failing of the national missions has been that they have not addressed the issues of empowerment and devolution to the third tier.
•  A simple solution would be for the Government of India to introduce an incentive grant system whereby states which devolve funds to some desired degree get to top up the financial grant from the Centre.
•  This should be limited to second-tier cities, which are crucial to a new urbanisation thrust. Metropolitan cities need such grants much less, since states can help them raise resources by empowering them to unlock land value.
•  They are also better placed to develop PPPs with viable revenue models to attract private funds.

Conclusion

•  Essentially, co-operative federalism needs to go deeper, below the state level. There are no shortcuts to improving the state of our cities.
•  The state governments need to decentralise, devolve and empower the cities.
•  We, as responsible citizens, need to engage with the government to find collective solutions while at the same time, holding the government accountable.

  Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

  General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1) Recently launched Smartnet initiative is under which Ministry?
(a) Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
(b) Ministry of Science and Technology
(c) Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship.
(d) Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology

Answer: A
Mains Questions:
Q.1) What are UN projection suggestions on India’s urbanization?