THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 30 October 2018 (Who pays taxes and who doesn’t )
Who pays taxes and who doesn’t
Mains Paper: 3 | Economy
Prelims level: Tax returns
Mains level: Financial inclusion in economy through taxation
Context
-
The Central Board of Direct Taxes has released the latest data on income tax collections.
-
Several interesting facts emerge from the data.
-
The number of taxpayers has increased drastically over the last four years.
-
The number of tax returns filed has surged to 6.85 crore in FY 2017-18, an 80% growth since FY 2013-14.
-
Also, the number of taxpayers reporting income greater than ₹1 crore has reached 1,40,139, an increase of 60% between assessment year (AY) 2014-15 and 2017-18.
Under-reporting still a concern
-
With low tax slabs, the average reported income has also increased, this is not the case with high income groups.
-
After 2016, the average income reported by those in the highest tax slab is 13% less than their average just before 2016.
-
Apparently, a number of high-income individuals (HIIs) grossly under-report their income.
-
The Income Declaration Scheme of 2016 and other official measures announced to stem tax evasion by the rich have failed to achieve the desired results.
What are loopholes?
-
Tax avoidance/ evasion by companies also remains an area of serious concern.
-
In AY 2017-18, a mere 7% of corporates reported profit before tax of more than ₹1 crore.
-
Again, the problem of under-reporting is serious with professional and the other service sector entities, which account for more than one-third of all corporates.
-
The share of direct taxes in the total tax collection has remained low.
How it can be improved?
-
The tax collection figures for this year look better.
-
Some of the apparent improvements will be due to cooking of the books by companies, facilitated by schemes like the Presumptive Taxation Scheme.
-
This allows an assessee to take full benefit of past evasion and escape without scrutiny, simply by paying a turnover tax.
-
To increasing the threshold from ₹1 crore to ₹2 crore, the government has made the scheme even more attractive.
-
The number of filers under the scheme shot up to 1.17 crore on August 31, 2018, from 14.93 lakh on August 31, 2017 — a stupendous growth of 681%!
Reforms in tax law needed
-
The extant tax law does not require filing of returns if the income is below the taxable threshold (₹2.5 lakh).
-
This means that many professionals who can easily manipulate their accounts never appear on the radar of the taxman.
-
The law should mandate filing of returns by all professionals and proprietorship businesses regardless of their profit.
-
This will increase compliance by enabling the taxman to scrutinise suspicious cases. There is also a case for the wealth tax.
-
Compared to income, the wealth level is harder to manipulate; therefore, the tax is harder to evade.
-
For companies, the tax law allows offsetting of past losses against future profits.
-
These provisions are widely misused by corporates by claiming bogus expenses, to artificially reduce their profit and hence their tax liability.
-
In, AY 2017-18, as much as 46% of corporates reported either losses or nil profit.
-
Another 47% reported profit less than ₹1 crore. These provisions need re-examining.
-
A large number of companies showing negligible or no profit points to a continued prevalence of shell companies and other dubious structures which require systematic investigation.
-
Moreover, the numerous tax exemptions also come in handy for tax avoidance.
-
Big corporates benefit more from these exemptions. Consequently, smaller companies face a higher effective tax rate compared to larger corporates.
-
This makes the tax regime regressive.
-
The Budget papers 2018, the effective tax rate of companies with profit greater than ₹500 crore was only 23.94%, while it was higher at 29.43% for companies with profits less than 1 crore.
Way forward
-
There is also a need to enhance the deterrence power of the law, which depends on the likelihood of punishing tax evaders along with imposing a fine.
-
At present, the Income Tax Department has a very poor win rate before the appellate tribunal and the higher judiciary.
-
As a result, the law does not bite enough to hurt the tax offender.
-
The odds of punishing the offenders can be increased by integrating the GST.
-
The income tax and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ databases.
-
These measures will go a long way in deepening the tax base among high-income groups and professionals.
-
The number of tax returns filed has gone up but collections have not shown a commensurate increase