THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 20 March 2020 (Competitive impropriety: On Ranjan Gogoi’s Rajya Sabha nomination(The Hindu))

Competitive impropriety: On Ranjan Gogoi’s Rajya Sabha nomination(The Hindu)

Mains Paper 2:Polity
Prelims level: Rajya Sabha nomination
Mains level:Appointment to various Constitutional posts, powers, functions and responsibilities of variousConstitutional Bodies

Context:

• The President’s nomination of former Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, as a Rajya Sabha member so soon after his retirement will be seen as a crass example of a regime rewarding a member of the judiciary for meeting its expectations during his tenure.

Background:

• It will be futile to argue that it is a well-deserved recognition for an eminent jurist.
• The gap of four months between his retirement and nomination, and the fact that a series of decisions in his court were in seeming conformity with the present government’s expectations militate against such a justification.

The second argument:

• There have been instances of retired Chief Justices being nominated to the Upper House or appointed Governors, does not cut ice either, as it is nothing more than a dubious claim to the same level of impropriety.
• In fact, references to the late CJI Ranganath Mishra and Justice Baharul Islam as valid precedents reflect quite poorly on the executive, and amount to competitive impropriety.

Past examples:

• There continues to be a perception that these were lapses in propriety. Justice Mishra’s commission of inquiry absolved the Congress from any organisational responsibility for the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. Justice Islam exonerated a Congress Chief Minister of wrong-doing in a financial scandal in Bihar.
• The party had helped Justice Islam move both ways between Parliament and the judiciary. He quit the Upper House in 1972 to take office as a High Court judge. In 1983, he quit as a Supreme Court judge to contest an election.

Cohesion between the judiciary and the legislature:

• Mr. Gogoi’s appointment cannot be seen, as he has sought to project, as a way of ensuring cohesion between the judiciary and the legislature. He no longer represents the judiciary, and his contribution will be........................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

Way forward:

• Also, he ought to have followed the example of his former colleagues who had declared that they would not accept any post-retirement work from the government.
• And one cannot forget that his tenure was clouded by an employee’s complaint of sexual harassment, which acquired greater credibility after she was reinstated following his exoneration by a committee of judges.
• As for the government, making such an offer to a just-retired CJI is not mere brazenness. It indicates an alarming intention to undermine judicial authority so that the elected executive is seen as all-powerful.

  Click here to Join IAS PRE Online Course

  General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1)With reference to the Sepsis, consider the following statements:
1. It is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the body’s immune system overreacting in response to an infection.
2. Sepsis can be caused only by Viruses.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: .......................................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

Mains Questions:
Q.1)What are the exceptions currently in place to ensure independence of the judiciary?What the 16-point code of conduct for judges says?