(FREE) UPSC Current Affairs 2024 PDF

THE GIST of Editorial for UPSC Exams : 02 June 2020 (Judging wisely in tough times (Indian Express))

Judging wisely in tough times (Indian Express)

Mains Paper 2:Polity
Prelims level: Judicial Activism
Mains level: Role of Judicial Activism in a democracy

Context:

In a democracy, sovereign power of the state rests on three pillars — legislature, executive and judiciary.
Well-defined boundaries prevent encroachment by one into the area of the other. The judiciary is the trustee of democracy and fundamental rights of the people.
It has the power of judicial review over the legislature and the executive.

Devised Public Interest Litigation methodology:

The Supreme Court, in the Eighties, devised Public ........................................................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

Empowers to issue several writs:

The Constitution empowers the judiciary to issue several writs.
The jurisdiction often exercised by the constitutional courts is to issue the writ of mandamus, a high prerogative writ, used principally for public purposes and to enforce the performance of public functions and mandatory duties by the state.

Judicial activism:

With the decline of purity in politics and the onset of corruption and inefficiency in public services, the judiciary has been emboldened into assuming more and more power over the legislature and executive.
This has come to be known as judicial activism.
PIL and judicial activism have earned applause as they have enabled the people to secure prompt relief and protection of their rights, which they failed in securing from the other two wings of governance.

Limitations in the judiciary:

Judges are appointed and not elected.
The judiciary does not have any investigation agency of its own to verify the truth of the averments made before it and assess the impact of its commands on people and the other two wings of governance.
The notions formed by the judges and reflected in their opinions depend on their own teachings and upbringing, which may not necessarily be reflective of the public opinion, which in a democracy can be voiced only by the elected representatives of people.
An error committed by the legislature or executive is capable of being corrected either by themselves or by the judiciary in the exercise of its power of judicial review. But an error in a judicial order, howsoever grave it may be, may not be capable of being corrected with that ease.
A saner jurisprudential precept is: Do not issue a decree that cannot be enforced or the execution whereof the court cannot supervise!

Slowing down the process of governance:

Several well-known instances from the past two decades show some judicial commands have created a lot of confusion and misunderstanding and also resulted in slowing down the normal process of governance.
Most competent, knowledgeable and bold officials who would have come up with innovative ideas to salvage an unusual situation are hesitant to act for the fear of being called upon to explain their action or inaction before the judiciary after many years, when memory and evidence have faded away.
Generally, the high officials of the government are conscientious, competent and go deep into the matter before planning the policies and taking decisions.
The three wings of governance ought to trust each other and should not begin with the assumption that the other wing of governance must have faltered.

Oath process:

The oath taken by every judge is ........................................................................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

To act on multiple fronts:

Faced with any extraordinary adversity such as a pandemic taking over the country, the government is suddenly called upon to act on multiple fronts.
Whatever good is done is often lost sight of and a casual view is formed that government has failed to act with the speed and vigour that some expect.
It catches public attention and, sometimes, those who assume for themselves the role of flag-bearers swing into action.
The media — print and electronic — may have failed in adequately highlighting the positive part of the executive’s actions.
The inactive or less active parts of the executive are at times highlighted by the media, which consider it a part of their obligation to activate governance.
Such highlights are not to be seen in isolation, segregated from immensely positive governmental planning and programmes.

Too much judicial activism turn out to be counter-productive:

The judiciary should be extremely cautious to see that it is not unwittingly lending its shoulders for somebody else’s gun to rest and fire.
Sometimes too much judicial activism may turn out to be counter-productive.
It may obstruct the normal functioning of the executive and divert the attention of public officials to collecting material for being placed before the court, drafting the pleadings and affidavits, briefing the government advocates (sometimes personal presence in the courts), making severe inroads on the time meant to be better utilised in the service of the nation and performing public service focused on meeting the challenges of calamities and endemics.
Faced with notice of the court, the executive may feel compelled to alter its well-thought-out priorities, resulting in imbalance. The means and resources of the executive are also limited and need a rational allocation.

Way forward:

It is common knowledge that during the ...........................................................................................................

CLICK HERE FOR FULL EDITORIAL (Only for Course Members)

Conclusion:

More the problems, more the need to concentrate on fighting adversities — public functionaries working day and night need our support and not pin-pricks.

Online Coaching for UPSC PRE Exam

E-Books Download for UPSC IAS Exams

General Studies Pre. Cum Mains Study Materials

Prelims Questions:

Q.1)With reference to the Central Institute of Petrochemicals Engineering & Technology (CIPET), consider the following statements:
1. CIPET is a premier national institution under the Union Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers.
2. It was established in 1968 by Government of India with the assistance of United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) at Delhi.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2