More psychological than an empowering
voter option (The Hindu)
Mains Paper 2: Polity
Prelims level: NOTA System
Mains level: Highlights the NOTA system in India
Context:
- The 2020 Delhi Assembly elections were the 45th Assembly polls since the
inception of the NOTA option in 2013.
- But, the meagre share of NOTA votes, and NOTA in its current form, are
pointers to it being a toothless option.
What does some data reveal?
- Delhi has now provided data from five elections with the NOTA option; no
other state has yielded such a preference for yet.
- But, Delhi’s preference to NOTA is less than the national average.
- The percentage of NOTA votes has increased in 71% constituencies in 2019
than in 2015.
- Roughly one in 200 voters of Delhi opted for NOTA in the last 6 to 7
years, with relatively larger support for NOTA in reserved constituencies.
- In the 2019 Maharashtra Assembly election, NOTA became a runner-up in
two constituencies.
NOTA system of India:
- In 2013, India became the 14th country to institute negative voting
through NOTA. However, it is not a “right to reject”.
- Even if there are 99 NOTA votes out of a total of 100, and candidate X
gets just one vote, X is the winner, having obtained the only valid vote.
- The rest of the NOTA votes will be treated as invalid or ‘no votes’.
- NOTA enfeeble the electorate as it does not empower to “select” either.
- It provides democratic means to express resentment anonymously rather
than boycotting the polls outright.
The scope of NOTA:
- A former Chief Election Commissioner recommended holding elections again
in those constituencies where the victory margin is less than the total
numbers of NOTA.
- A PIL has been filed in Madras High Court seeking the full right to
reject in place of NOTA.
- In 2018, the Maharashtra State Election Commission (SEC) issued an order
that if NOTA has received the highest number of valid votes, a fresh
election shall be held for such a post.
- The SEC of Haryana issued an order that if NOTA gets maximum vote, none
of the “real” candidates will be declared elected.
- The re-elections will be held afresh and the candidates securing votes
less than NOTA would be barred from contesting in that re-election.
Can NOTA bring any significant change?
- While introducing NOTA, the Supreme Court anticipated that there will be
a systemic change.
- It also predicted that the political parties will be forced to accept
the will of the people and field candidates who are known for their
integrity.
- NOTA percentage should either increase to enforce the political parties
to field candidates with “integrity”.
- Or NOTA percentage should consistently decrease if the electorates feel
that the system has achieved the desired level of cleansing.
- In contrast, the share of NOTA votes in India remained around a meagre
level of 1% on an average; 1.11% in the 2014 Lok Sabha, and 1.08% in 2019,
if we consider constituency-wise averages.
- This perhaps represents a confused state of mind of the electorate.
Way ahead:
- The ECI may state that the candidates securing lesser votes than NOTA
are barred from contesting in the next election from that constituency.
- An experiment can be conducted by using NOTB (‘none of the below’)
instead of NOTA, after changing the rule suitably, can be attempted.
- This may help us whether such an option as the first on the electronic
voting machine might produce a significantly different outcome or not.
Prelims Questions:
Q1. With reference to the Force majeure, consider the following
statements:
1. It refers to an extraordinary events and circumstances beyond human
control.
2. It encompasses only natural reasons or an act of God.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: A
Mains Questions:
Q1. What is the NOTA system of India? What are the pleas to extend the
scope of NOTA? Will NOTA bring any significant change? Comment.