UPSC IAS Mains Public Administration Solved Exam
Paper - 2011
Paper - II
Section-A
Q1. Attempt the following m not more than 200 words each: 20 x 3 = 60
(a) "Over-dependence on bureaucracy for bringing about socio-economic
development in India has proved to be dysfunctional." Comment.
(b) "The performance of Lok Ayuktas in various States has been uneven."
Comment with examples.
(c) Explain with appropriate illustrations the interface between' political
culture and bureaucratic culture in contemporary India.
Answer:
(a) "Over-dependence on bureaucracy for bringing about socio-economic
development in India has proved to be dysfunctional." Comment.
The main reason is that the bureaucracy is not able to cope
up with the emerging challenges because of its colonial master’s mentality. On
the other hand, frequent political interference in bureaucratic matter retard
the process of development . Bureaucracy in India is more interested in
regulatory administration rather than development administration. The personnel
which are meant to be the engines of socio-economic change end up as mere agents
of state. Bureaucracy in India is considered to have the following
characteristics:-
- too large and slow.
- extremely rigid and mechanical.
- consequently not flexible and adaptive to cope with change.
- not innovative and enterprising.
- low motivation and low morale.
- accountability is low.
- not democratic.
- lack of expertise.
India adopted Weberian bureaucracy, it was made for the
status quo and not to change the socio-economic system. According to Riggs
development is equivalent to diffraction which include both administrative
development and participation. We have focused on administrative development
while ignoring the participation. Despite the talks of community involvement
actual work at the ground level is done by bureaucracy. Both willingness and
ability to participate is necessary for development. There is need of full
involvement of NGO’s, Self help group and other voluntary agencies in
development process to significantly enhance people’s participation.
(b) "The performance of Lok Ayuktas in various States has been uneven."
Comment with examples.
The Lokayukta is an anti-corruption ombudsman organization in the Indian
states. A closer look at the performance of Lokayuktas in Indian states does not
create a very positive impression.
In Bihar the Lokayukta closed a case when he could not get a report from the
state government for as long as eight years on the conduct of a minister.
In Andhra Pradesh, Governor Kumudben Joshi did not endorse the nomination for
the office of Lokayukta made by Chief Minister N T Rama Rao, leading to the
abolition of the institution for a while.
In Odisha the appointment of Lokpal was held up for as many as four years by
its Chief Minister, J B Patnaik.
In Maharashtra, when the Lokayukta found two ministers of the state
government guilty of malpractice, his report was considered politically
motivated.
In Andhra Pradesh, when the Lokayukta successfully completed
investigations against many civil servants and former and serving ministers, the
High Court and the Administrative Tribunal came in the way of awarding
punishment to them.
Although this picture was not bleak always but some
commendable work was also done by the Lokayukta of Andhra Pradesh (during the
first term of N T Rama Rao) and by that of Karnataka (during the tenures of R K
Hegde and Birendra Patil) . The track record of the Lokayukta of Madhya Pradesh
has also been satisfactory.
(c) Explain with appropriate illustrations the interface between'
political culture and bureaucratic culture in contemporary India.
In India political culture is identified with generalist
approach. It represents the dynamic aspiration of the society and creates a
framework for political change. On the other hand bureaucratic culture is
technical and specialist in nature because bureaucracy is instrumental in
carrying out all public activities in legal manner with standard procedure.
In India bureaucratic culture is more developed rather than
political one ,so it is the main reason of rift between the two. Administrative
culture is more hierarchial and political one is more democratic . In theory
they have to work in smooth and frictionless manner but in practice, there are
many instances of friction between the two.